Nike Air Zoom Victory Tour 3 Golf Shoes
With the subtle improvements to the previous Victory 2, the new 3 is one of the best golf shoes on the market. In every department the performance is excellent – comfort, grip, protection, looks – Nike has absolutely nailed it here.
For
- Outstanding comfort and feel
- Total performance
- Look absolutely fantastic
Under Armour Drive Pro Golf Shoe
A spiked shoe that delivers on all levels of performance thanks to a comprehensive and well designed new traction system. While the materials and looks don’t scream premium, the upgraded technology and performance on display will be very attractive to the serious golfers
For
- Exemplary grip
- Excellent sensation of foot support with flexibility
- Slightly softer sensation underfoot than previous models
Against
- Upper materials not as premium as its rivals
Nike Air Zoom Victory Tour 3 vs Under Armour Drive Pro Golf Shoe: Read Our Head-To-Head Verdict
Under Armour and Nike are two of the most popular brands in golf apparel and they sponsor some of the biggest names in the sport. Under Armour‘s most famous ambassador is Jordan Spieth while Nike have a whole host of star names in their stable, including Rory McIlroy, Brooks Koepka, Scottie Scheffler and Nelly Korda.
In this piece, we will be focusing on the Nike Air Zoom Victory Tour 3 (as worn by McIlroy) and the Under Armour Drive Pro shoe (which Spieth helped to design), to see which is best.
Both are outstanding shoes in their own right but deciding which are the best golf shoes for you can be a difficult decision. That’s why we are here to go through what makes these shoes great in this head-to-head, and hopefully at the end of it you’ll know which one is for you.
Looks
Starting with the shoes worn by McIlroy, the Nike Air Zoom Victory Tour 3s have done a fine job building on the success of the Victory Tour 2s and improving on them further. The new design is different in some subtle ways while the new full-grain leather upper has a sophisticated look and supple feel.
Along with the upper, the swoosh and midsole sections look slightly different to the previous model and overall we think the shoe just seems a little more refined. It looks like more of a traditionally sporty golf shoe that will suit a wide range of ages, whereas the previous model was perhaps better suited to younger audiences.
We are also fans of the various colorways, in particular the the fade of the shoe from blue to green on the model that we…
..
Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at Golf Monthly…