When people say the word St. Andrews, there are a number of thoughts that can rush to your head. For a lot of people, that image is the Swilcan Bridge which has recently received a bit of a makeover and some aren’t best pleased about it.
Just last year, Tiger Woods made what he thinks could be his final Open appearance at St. Andrews, but caused optimism amongst fans as he made the iconic journey over the Swilcan Bridge without stopping for a photo, before an emotional walk up the 18th fairway.
In 2005, one of our game’s greatest players, Jack Nicklaus, ended his career at the Home of Golf – creating, arguably, one of the most iconic moments as he waved farewell to fans on the bridge before holing his final stroke at the Old Course for birdie.
Nicklaus during the 2005 Open Championship
(Image credit: Getty)
10 years before the ‘Golden Bear’, it was Arnold Palmer who created history as he said goodbye to St. Andrews and, once again, the moment was shared on the Swilcan Bridge. It was an emotional ending as The King was vital to the future success of The Open, reiterating the importance of the tournament to his compatriots which has helped carve the event into what it is today.
It is true that the Swilcan Bridge is among the most famous bridges in the world, not quite up there with the Tyne Bridge, Tower Bridge or Golden Gate Bridge, but you get my point, it’s pretty iconic.
However, recently, the bridge has seen some changes and, as a result, golf fans have fled to Twitter to blast the decision to add a ‘patio-like landing’ just in front of the opening which has seen golf greats cross to the other side.
Such was the extent of the change that one user, @warrenallsworth, said: “No. Just no. That’s like drawing a moustache on the Mona Lisa.”
No. Just no. That’s like drawing a moustache on the Mona Lisa.February 4, 2023
Another Tweet blasted the decision, stating: “A great and iconic sporting landmark turned into an eyesore. What ludicrous thinking brought this about? It has ruined one of the historic holes in golf.”
Some other users agreed with the decision to add the brick work though, with one explaining that it “makes sense if the ground which sees an increase in more tourists standing to take photos with bridge in, is getting churned up. This could preserve the area for the long term.”
There is yet to be any comment on why the decision has been made to introduce it. However, it is easy to assume that they are looking to protect the…
..
Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at Golf Monthly RSS Feed…